Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Common Core State Standards FAQ #2: Argumentative vs. Persuasive Writing

Q. Please address the emphasis on argumentative writing versus persuasive writing in your materials.

A. Consistent with the common core state standards, Mirrors & Windows places a strong focus on writing logical arguments as an important form of college- and career-ready writing. The labels “persuasive” and “argumentative” writing are often used interchangeably—the purpose of both types is to persuade. The common core state standards draw the distinction that “logical arguments should convince the audience with the perceived merit and reasonableness of the claims and proofs offered” rather than to persuade using “either the emotions the writer evokes in the audience or the character or credentials of the writer.”

While Mirrors & Windows uses the label “persuasive writing” for the numerous argumentative writing opportunities throughout the program, these assignments clearly ask writers to support their arguments and opinions with convincing, reasonable evidence.

As an example, the Mirrors & Windows Grade 10 Unit 4 Writing Workshop assignment asks students to “Write a persuasive essay, aiming to convince a larger audience to consider your viewpoint about a subject that is important to you.” The text offers the following definition for a persuasive essay:
“In a persuasive essay, the writer respectfully presents a clear position on an issue, using logic, reason, and information, to convince readers to see his or her viewpoint and, if appropriate, to take action on it.”
Mirrors & Windows provides persuasive/argumentative writing activities throughout the program in post-reading Writing Option assignments and in-depth Writing Workshops at the end of each unit and in the Exceeding the Standards: Writing supplement.

Friday, January 14, 2011

“Twain’s Forest vs. literalists small trees”

Columnist D.J. Tice’s January 13th Minneapolis Star Tribune article in the wake of the media “blizzard of blather” about the publication of a "sanitized" version of Mark Twain’s novel Huckleberry Finn makes an excellent point. We shouldn’t get so caught up in the language of Twain’s Huckleberry Finn that we lose sight of the real message of Huck’s story.

Tice states that “Huck Finn is about the folly of ever trusting the fashionable morality of one's own time and place. Any time, any place. It's a warning that some of the worst mistakes come when we're absolutely sure about something -- and everyone we know agrees with us.
Huck dramatizes this by violating the slave South's moral order without for one moment realizing that his society's values are corrupt. Huck simply loves Jim, the runaway slave, as an individual, and can't help himself.”

EMC’s Access Edition novels of Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer are published in their original “unsanitized” versions, in the vernacular of the time and place. When teaching Twain's work in the secondary classroom it is important to emphasize the context of the language and the true meaning of his message.

You can view samples of EMC’s Access Editions novels at http://www.emcp.com/previews/AccessEditions/

Read Tice’s complete StarTribune column at
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/113314639.html?elr=KArksUUUoDEy3LGDiO7aiU